Accessibility evaluation report

WCAG-EM Step 5. Fill this in and print it. Every section below is required by the methodology — the one people leave out is the sample, and it is the one that makes the report checkable.

1. Summary

Website evaluated

Evaluated by

Date of evaluation

Conformance target

Result

State it literally. "The 8 pages evaluated on 9 September 2026 did not meet WCAG 2.2 Level AA; 15 criteria failed." Never a percentage.

Executive summary — the three things a decision-maker must know

2. Scope

Website definition, including domains and URL patterns

Exclusions, and why

Accessibility support baseline

3. Sample evaluated

List every page, with the reason it was chosen. This is what allows another auditor to reproduce your work.

Pages evaluated
#	Page	URL	Why chosen
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

4. Method and tools

Automated tools, browsers, assistive technology, and manual procedures used

5. Findings

One row per defect, not per instance. If one component fails on six pages, that is one finding affecting six pages.

Detailed findings
#	SC	Severity	Where	What happens	Recommended fix
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

6. What is working well

Practices worth keeping and building on

7. Recommended priority

In order. Blockers first, then anything on an essential task.

8. Limitations of this evaluation

What this report does not tell you

Always include this. A sample can disprove conformance but never prove it, and no audit substitutes for testing with disabled users.